|
Design Tips Contributed by Various renowned Consultants and Practicing Engineers |
A Web Site for Contractors |
|
|
| RCC MEMBER DESIGN TIPS (Contributed by Mr. THIRUMALAICHETTIAR RANGARAJAN) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IMPORTANCE OF DETAILING OF TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT FOR BEAMS,COLUMNS AND WALLS (Contributed by Mr. THIRUMALAICHETTIAR RANGARAJAN) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contributed by Mr. THIRUMALAICHETTIAR RANGARAJAN - He is a consulting structural engineer practicing in Coimbatore | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beams | Slabs | Column | Footings | RCC Walls | Miscellaneous | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
OVERALL DEPTH OF BEAMS:
1. Beam sections should be designed for:
EFFECTIVE DEPTH:
5. If the roof is of sheet(AC/GI) supported by load bearing wall (without any frames) a bed block of 150/200mm shall be provided along the length of supports except at the eaves. The bed block is provided to keep the sheets in position from WIND. 6. For the roof slab provide a min. of 0.24% of slab cross sectional area reinforcement to take care of the temperature and other weathering agent and for the ponding of rain water etc since it is exposed to outside the building enclosure.
The Common assumption of full fixity at the column base may only be valid for columns supported on RIGID RAFT foundations or on individual foundation pads supported by short stiff piles or by foundation walls in Basement. Foundation pads supported on deformable soil may have considerable rotational flexibility, resulting in column forces in the bottom storey quite different from those resulting from the assumption of a rigid base. The consequences can be unexpected column HINGES at the top of lower storey columns under seismic lateral forces. In such cases the column base should be modeled by a rotational springs. (Ref:page 164-Seismic design of Reinforced concrete and Masonry buildings by T.Paulay & M.J.N.Priestley.) Also refer the Reinforced concrete Designers Handbook by Reynold where it is clearly mention about the column base support.
a) 0.0012 of cross sectional area for deformed bars not larger than 16mm in diameter and with characteristic strength 415 N/mm^2 or greater. b) 0.0015 of cross sectional area for other types of bars. c) 0.0012 of cross sectional area for welded fabric not larger than 16mm in diameter. Maximum horizontal spacing for the vertical reinforcement shall neither exceed three times the wall thickness nor 450mm.
a) 0.0020 of cross sectional area for deformed bars not larger than 16mm in diameter and with characteristic strength 415 N/mm^2 or greater. b) 0.0025 of cross sectional area for other types of bars. c) 0.0020 of cross sectional area for welded fabric not larger than 16mm in diameter. Maximum vertical l spacing for the vertical reinforcement shall neither exceed three times the wall thickness nor 450mm. NOTE: The minimum reinforcement may not always be sufficient to provide adequate resistance to effects of shrinkage and temperature. 2. The He/t for a RCC wall shall not exceed 30 as per IS:456=2000, where He is the effective height of the wall and t is the thickness of the RC wall. He for a braced wall will be : a) 0.75 H, if the rotations are restrained at the ends by floors where h is the height of the wall. b) 1.0h . Ref: (Principle of structures by Ariel Hanaor). 1. TRUSS: The Depth to span ratio for a truss is h/L=10. Beyond a certain optimal value, increase in structural depth increases weight. The same principle applies to trusses. An optimal depth/span ratio for a planar truss is approximately 1/10. Although forces in the CHORDS decrease with increasing depth, forces in the WEB are practically UNCHANGED and increasing the depth increases the lengths of these members. Approximately half the web members are in COMPRESSION and increasing their lengths reduces their efficiency due to the increased susceptibility to BUCKLING.
The span to depth ratio=1/8 to 1/10 are typical. The compression on top chord or tension in the bottom chord for a UDL loading is C=T= qL^2/8h where q is the udl and h is the depth.
A structure in pure TENSION having the funicular shape of its load is termed as Cable.
4.ARCH: Let us now invert the shape of a cable under a given load, that is the sag at any point is turned into a rise. The point is now above the chord joining the end points by the same amount it was previously below it. A structure built according to the funicular shape in COMPRESSION is termed as an ARCH. The optional rise to span ratio for an arch is in the range of 1/6-1/4. The depth to span ratio of an arch is usually in the range of 1/40 -1/70.
The typical depth /span ratio is in the range from 1/15 to 1/10.
A typical depth of a solid FLAT PLATE is 1/22 -1/18 of the effective span.
Supported on continuous stiff supports are in the range of 1/30-1/25 of the lesser effective span.
Typical depth of flat plate ribbed slabs are in the range of 1/20-1/17 of the lesser effective span.
The structural depth of DOMES is the full height of the dome from base to crown. Depth to span ratio range from as low as 1/8 for shallow domes to ½ for deep domes. A depth /span ratio of 1/5-1/4 is a common value which is near optimal for many applications. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contributed by Mr. THIRUMALAICHETTIAR RANGARAJAN - He is a consulting structural engineer practicing in Coimbatore | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IMPORTANCE OF DETAILING OF TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT FOR BEAMS,COLUMNS AND WALLS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The detailing of reinforcement is as important as the analysis and design of any RCC members. Specially it is true in the design of structures against the SEISMIC forces. The most and very important aspect of detailing is well documented in the text book on SEISMIC DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE AND MASONRY BUILDINGS by T.Paulay and M.J.N.Priestley. The text extraction is given below for the structural engineers who need to know more about the importance of the above issue. Page: 157: The spacing of the transverse reinforcement is as important as the quantity to be provided. For this reason, recommended maximum spacings of sets of transverse ties along a member, required for four specific purposes, are summarized here.
In beams s≤0.5d or 600mm(24) In columns s≤0.75h or 600mm(24) In walls s≤2.5bw or 450mm(18)
s≤6.0db, or s≤d/4, s≤ 150mm(6)
sh≤ bc/3 , sh ≤ hc/3 , sh ≤6 db, sh≤180mm(7).
s≤8.0db, s≤200mm(8).
Page:208: The diameter of stirrup ties should not be less than 6mm(0.25) and the area of one leg of stirrup tie in the direction of potential buckling of longitudinal bars should not be less than Ate=∑ Ab fy s _____________(Mpa) 16 fyt 100 For design purpose it is convenient to rearrange the above equation in the form: Ate/s = ∑ Ab fy /1600 fyt (mm^2/mm) Where Ab is the sum of the areas of the longitudinal bars reliant on the tie, including the tributary area of any bars exempted from being tied in accordance with the proceding section. Ate is the area of the stirrup tie in mm^2. fy is the yield strength of longitudinal bars. fyt is the yield strength of tie bars
Page 128: Because of the reversal of shear forces in members affected by earthquakes, the placing of stirrups at an angle other than 90Ө to the axis of such members is generally impractical. The choice of the angle 45 Ө for the plane of the diagonal tension failure in the region of potential plastic is a compromise. Please note that in IS 13920 it is not recommended to use single bent up bars.
Minimum shear reinforcement: Current codes (NewZeland) require the provision of minimum amount of shear reinforcement in the range of 0.0015 ≤Av/bwsC0.0020 in members affected by earthquake forces. ii) Spacing of stirrups: To ensure that potential diagonal tension failure planes are crossed by sufficient sets of stirrups, spacing limitations such as set out below, have been widely used. The spacing s should not exceed: 1. In beams: In general :0.5d or 600mm(24) When (vi-vc) > 0.07 fc: 0.25d or 300mm(12). 2. In columns: When Pu/Ag≤0.12 fc; as in beams When Pu/Ag > 0.12 fc: 0.75 or 800mm(24). 3. In walls, 2.5 times the wall thickness or 450mm(18). Spacing limitations to satisfy requirements for the confinement of compressed concrete and the stabilizing of compression bars in potential plastic hinge regions are likely to be more restrictive.
Page:233: Design of transverse Reinforcement: (a) General considerations: There are four design requirements that control the amount of transverse reinforcement to be provided in COLUMNS: 1. Shear strength; 2. Prevention of buckling of compression bars; 3. Confinement of compressed concrete in potential plastic hinge regions or over the full length of column subjected to very large compression stresses and; 4. The strength of lapped bar splices. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||